On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 09:16:49PM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote: > It looks like even though the commit e5253fdc4f that added the > parallel_leader_participation GUC correctly categorized it as > RESOURCES_ASYNCHRONOUS parameter in the code, but in the docs it is kept > under irrelevant section i.e. "Query Planning/Other Planner Options". This > is reported in the bugs list [1], cc-ed the reporter. > > Attaching a small patch that moves the GUC description to the right place. > Thoughts?
I would keep the discussion on the existing thread rather than spawn a new one on -hackers for exactly the same problem, so I'll reply there in a minute. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
