On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 11:00 AM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 02:28:38PM +0200, Erik Rijkers wrote: > > So, that gives information on two operators, and then gives one > > example query for each. Clearly, the second example was meant to > > illustrate a where-clause with the @? operator. > > > > Small change to prevent great confusion (I'll admit it took me far > > too long to understand this). > > Once one guesses the definition of the table to use with the sample > data at disposal in the docs, it is easy to see that both queries > should return the same result, but the second one misses the shot and > is corrected as you say. So, applied. > > My apologies for the delay.
My apologies for missing this. And thank you for taking care! ------ Regards, Alexander Korotkov
