Le jeu. 15 avr. 2021 à 09:58, Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> a écrit :
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 05:31:15AM -0700, Noah Misch wrote: > > The name "without_extension_explicit_schema" arose because that test > differs > > from the "without_extension" test by adding --schema=public. The test > named > > "without_extension_implicit_schema" differs from "without_extension" by > adding > > --schema=regress_pg_dump_schema, so the word "implicit" feels > not-descriptive > > of the test. I recommend picking a different name. Other than that, the > > change looks good. > > Thanks for the review. I have picked up "internal" instead, as > that's the schema created within the extension itself, and applied the > patch. > Thanks for the work on this. I didn't understand everything on the issue, which is why I didn't say a thing, but I followed the thread, and very much appreciated the fix. -- Guillaume.
