On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 8:20 PM James Coleman <jtc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hmm, could be. Although, the stack trace at issue doesn't seem to show > > a call to create_incrementalsort_plan(). > > The changes to gather merge path generation made it possible to use > those paths in more cases for both incremental sort and regular sort, > so by "incremental sort" I read Tomas as saying "the patches that > brought in incremental sort" not specifically "incremental sort > itself".
I agree. That's why I said "hmm, could be" even though the plan doesn't involve one. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
