Charlie Hornsby <charlie.horn...@hotmail.co.uk> writes: > I tested the above patch with the invalid data locally and it avoids > the restore error that we ran into previously. Also it requires no > intervention to progress with pg_upgrade unlike my initial idea of > adding an check, so it is definitely simpler from a user perspective.
Thanks for testing! I've pushed this, so it will be in the May minor releases. regards, tom lane