Charlie Hornsby <charlie.horn...@hotmail.co.uk> writes:
> I tested the above patch with the invalid data locally and it avoids
> the restore error that we ran into previously.  Also it requires no
> intervention to progress with pg_upgrade unlike my initial idea of
> adding an check, so it is definitely simpler from a user perspective.

Thanks for testing!  I've pushed this, so it will be in the May
minor releases.

                        regards, tom lane


Reply via email to