On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 4:34 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 6:19 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 10:27 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 9:53 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > It seems Vignesh has changed patches based on the latest set of > > > > comments so you might want to rebase. > > > > > > I've merged my patch into the v6 patch set Vignesh submitted. > > > > > > I've attached the updated version of the patches. I didn't change > > > anything in the patch that changes char[NAMEDATALEN] to NameData (0001 > > > patch) and patches that add tests. > > > > > > > I think we can push 0001. What do you think? > > +1 > > > > > > In 0003 patch I reordered the > > > output parameters of pg_stat_replication_slots; showing total number > > > of transactions and total bytes followed by statistics for spilled and > > > streamed transactions seems appropriate to me. > > > > > > > I am not sure about this because I think we might want to add some > > info of stream/spill bytes in total_bytes description (something like > > stream/spill bytes are not in addition to total_bytes). > > Okay. > > > So probably > > keeping these new counters at the end makes more sense to me. > > But I think all of those counters are new for users since > pg_stat_replication_slots view will be introduced to PG14, no? >
Right, I was referring to total_txns and total_bytes attributes. I think keeping them at end after spill and stream counters should be okay. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
