On 4/11/21 12:51 PM, Dave Cramer wrote:
On Sun, 11 Apr 2021 at 12:43, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us <mailto:t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>> wrote:I wrote: > Joe Conway <m...@joeconway.com <mailto:m...@joeconway.com>> writes: >> Would an equivalent "PGWARNING" be something we are open to adding and >> back-patching? > It's not real obvious how pl/r could solve this in a reliable way > otherwise, so adding that would be OK with me, but I wonder whether > back-patching is going to help you any. You'd still need to compile > against older headers I should think. So I'd suggest > (1) add PGWARNING in HEAD only Concretely, maybe like the attached? +1 from me.I especially like the changes to the comments as it's more apparent what they should be used for.
+1 Looks great to me. Joe -- Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development
