On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 8:19 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 1. > I felt that this protocol documentation needs to include something > like a "Since: 2" notation (e.g. see how the javadoc API [1] does it) > otherwise with more message types and more protocol versions it is > quickly going to become too complicated to know what message or > message attribute belongs with what protocol. > > > Updated. > 2. > There are inconsistent terms used for a transaction id. > e.g.1 Sometimes called " Transaction id." > e.g.2 Sometimes called "Xid of the transaction" > I think there should be consistent terminology used on this page > Updated. regards, Ajin Cherian Fujitsu Australia
v3-0001-doc-Update-information-of-new-messages-for-logica.patch
Description: Binary data
