On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 8:29 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Peter Geoghegan <p...@bowt.ie> writes: > > Do you think that it's okay that we rely on the propagation of global > > state to parallel workers on Postgres 13? Don't we need something like > > my fixup commit 49f49def on Postgres 13 as well? At least for the > > EXEC_BACKEND case, I think. > > Uh ... *what* propagation of global state to parallel workers? Workers > fork off from the postmaster, not from their leader process.
Right. I think we should apply that fix on PG13 as well. Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com/
