On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 11:29:17PM -0400, Greg Rychlewski wrote: > Thanks for pointing that out. I've attached a new patch with several other > updates where I felt confident the docs were referring to an ACCESS > EXCLUSIVE lock.
Thanks, applied! I have reviewed the whole and there is one place in vacuum.sgml that could switch "exclusive lock" to "SHARE UPDATE EXCLUSIVE lock" but I have left that out as it does not bring more clarity in the text. The change in indexam.sgml was partially wrong as REINDEX CONCURRENTLY does not take an access exclusive lock, and I have tweaked a bit the wording of pgrowlocks.sgml. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
