On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 7:20 PM Markus Wanner <markus.wan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > On 31.03.21 15:18, Amit Kapila wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 11:55 AM Markus Wanner > >> The last sentences there now seems to relate to just the setting of > >> "concurrent_abort", rather than the whole reason to invoke the > >> prepare_cb. And the reference to the "gid" is a bit lost. Maybe: > >> > >> "Thus even in case of a concurrent abort, enough information is > >> provided to the output plugin for it to properly deal with the > >> <command>ROLLBACK PREPARED</command> once that is decoded." > > > > Okay, Changed the patch accordingly. > > That's fine with me. >
Pushed. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.