On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 8:14 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 2:21 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > The logical replication tablesync worker creates tablesync slots. > > > > Previously some PG docs pages were referring to these as "tablesync > > slots", but other pages called them as "table synchronization slots". > > > > PSA a trivial patch which (for consistency) now calls them all the > > same - "tablesync slots" > > > > +1 for the consistency. But I think it better to use "table > synchronization slots" in the user-facing docs as that makes it easier > for users to understand. >
PSA patch version 2 updated to use "table synchronization slots" as suggested. ------ Kind Regards, Peter Smith. Fujitsu Australia
v2-0001-Use-consistent-terminology-for-tablesync-slots.patch
Description: Binary data
