On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 11:02:32AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Julien Rouhaud <rjuju...@gmail.com> writes:
> > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 02:47:05PM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> >> I'd say that this is certainly wrong:
> >> SELECT point('NaN','NaN') <@ polygon('(0,0),(1,0),(1,1),(0,0)');
> >>
> >> ?column?
> >> ----------
> >> t
> >> (1 row)
>
> > Yeah that's what I think too, but I wanted to have confirmation.
>
> Agreed --- one could make an argument for either 'false' or NULL
> result, but surely not 'true'.
I would think that it should return NULL since it's not inside nor outside the
polygon, but I'm fine with false.
> I wonder if Horiguchi-san's patch [1] improves this case.
Oh I totally missed that patch :(
After a quick look I see this addition in point_inside():
+ /* NaN makes the point cannot be inside the polygon */
+ if (unlikely(isnan(x) || isnan(y)))
+ return 0;
So I would assume that it should fix this case too. I'll check tomorrow.
