On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 at 12:04, David Steele <da...@pgmasters.net> wrote:
> On 1/26/21 1:02 PM, Dave Cramer wrote: > > On Tue, 26 Jan 2021 at 12:46, Laurenz Albe <laurenz.a...@cybertec.at > > <mailto:laurenz.a...@cybertec.at>> wrote: > > > > I see your point from the view of the JDBC driver. > > > > It just feels hacky - somewhat similar to what you say > > above: don't go through the normal transaction rollback steps, > > but issue an error message. > > > > At least we should fake it well... > > > > OK, let me look into how we deal with COMMIT and CHAIN. > > > > I can see some real issues with this as Vik pointed out. > > Test are failing on the cfbot for this patch and it looks like a new > patch is needed from Dave, at the least, so marking Waiting on Author. > > Should we be considering this patch Returned with Feedback instead? > > Not sure, at this point the impetus for this is not getting a lot of traction. Honestly I think the approach I took is too simple and I don't have the inclination at the moment to rewrite it. Dave Cramer www.postgres.rocks > Regards, > -- > -David > da...@pgmasters.net >
