On 10.03.21 14:52, David Steele wrote:
I thought about it a little bit more, and the prefix specification
has not too much sense (more if we implement this functionality as
function "unistr"). I removed the optional argument and renamed the
function to "unistr". The functionality is the same. Now it supports
Oracle convention, Java and Python (for Python UXXXXXXXX) and
\+XXXXXX. These formats was already supported.The compatibility witth
Oracle is nice.
Peter, it looks like Pavel has aligned this function with unistr() as
you suggested. Thoughts?
I haven't read through the patch in detail yet, but I support the
proposed details of the functionality.
