On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 06:24:07PM +0000, Bossart, Nathan wrote: > LGTM. I just have a few small wording suggestions. > > + completion overhead. Reducing this parameter is not recommended as > that > + causes the I/O from the checkpoint to have to complete faster, > resulting > + in a higher I/O rate, while then having a period of less I/O between > the > + completion of the checkpoint and the start of the next scheduled > + checkpoint. This parameter can only be set in the > > Reducing this parameter is not recommended because it forces the > checkpoint to complete faster. This results in a higher rate of I/O > during the checkpoint followed by a period of less I/O between > checkpoint completion and the next scheduled checkpoint.
FYI, I am very happy this issue is being addressed for PG 14. :-) -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.
