On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 2:44 PM Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@oss.nttdata.com> wrote: > I found 0001 patch was committed in de829ddf23, and which added new > wait event WalrcvExit. This name seems not consistent with other wait > events. I'm thinking it's better to rename it to WalReceiverExit. Thought? > Patch attached.
Agreed, your names are better. Thanks.
