On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 1:48 PM Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > Thanks for that. Attached is just a rebased version with a commit > message added. If there aren't any other concerns, I'll commit this in > the next few days and back-patch it. When it comes to 12 and older, > does anyone want to opine about the wait event to use? I was thinking > PG_WAIT_TIMEOUT or WAIT_EVENT_PG_SLEEP ...
I'm not sure if we should back-patch this, but I think if you do you should just add a wait event, rather than using a generic one. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
