I wrote:
> Needs a little more work than that --- we should allow it to respond
> to the --no-owner switch, for example. But I think likely we can do
> it where other object ownership is handled. I'll look in a bit.
Actually ... said code already DOES do that, so now I'm confused.
I tried
regression=# create user joe;
CREATE ROLE
regression=# create database joe owner joe;
CREATE DATABASE
regression=# \q
$ pg_dump -Fc joe >joe.dump
$ pg_restore --create -f - joe.dump | more
and I see
--
-- Name: joe; Type: DATABASE; Schema: -; Owner: joe
--
CREATE DATABASE joe WITH TEMPLATE = template0 ENCODING = 'SQL_ASCII' LOCALE =
'C';
ALTER DATABASE joe OWNER TO joe;
so at least in this case it's doing the right thing. We need a bit
more detail about the context in which it's doing the wrong thing
for you.
regards, tom lane
