Hi, On 2021-03-19 14:03:21 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > The Red Hat folk are seeing a problem with that combination: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1940964 > > which boils down to > > > Build fails with this error: > > ERROR: failed to JIT module: Added modules have incompatible data layouts: > > E-m:e-i1:8:16-i8:8:16-i64:64-f128:64-a:8:16-n32:64 (module) vs > > E-m:e-i1:8:16-i8:8:16-i64:64-f128:64-v128:64-a:8:16-n32:64 (jit) > > (By "build", I imagine the reporter means "regression tests") > > So I was wondering if we'd tested it yet.
Yes, I did test it not too long ago, after Christoph Berg reported Debian s390x failing with jit. Which made me learn a bunch of s390x assembler and discover a bug in our code that only rarely happend (iirc something about booleans that are not exactly 0 or 1 not testing true)... https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20201015222924.yyms42qjloydfvar%40alap3.anarazel.de I think the error above comes from a "mismatch" between the clang used to compile bitcode, and the LLVM version linked to. Normally we're somewhat tolerant of differences between the two, but there was an ABI change at some point, leading to that error. IIRC I hit that, but it vanished as soon as I used a matching libllvm and clang. Greetings, Andres Freund
