On Thu, Mar 18, 2021, at 5:51 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote: > OK. Can you prepare a patch with the proposed test approach? I'm on it.
> FWIW I can reproduce this on a 32-bit ARM system (rpi4), where 500 rows > simply does not use a temp file, and with 1000 rows it works fine. On > the x86_64 the temp file is created even with 500 rows. So there clearly > is some platform dependency, not sure if it's due to 32/64 bits, > alignment or something else. In any case, the 500 rows seems to be just > on the threshold. > > We need to do both - stop using the timing and increase the number of > rows, to consistently get temp files. Yeah. -- Euler Taveira EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
