On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 12:00 AM Mark Dilger <mark.dil...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Your proposal is used in this next version of the patch, along with a > resolution to the solution to the -D option handling, discussed before, and a > change to make --schema and --exclude-schema options accept "database.schema" > patterns as well as "schema" patterns. It previously only interpreted the > parameter as a schema without treating embedded dots as separators, but that > seems strangely inconsistent with the way all the other pattern options work, > so I made it consistent. (I think the previous behavior was defensible, but > harder to explain and perhaps less intuitive.)
Well, OK. In that case I guess we need to patch the docs a little more. Here's a patch documentation that revised behavior, and also tidying up a few other things I noticed along the way. Since nobody is saying we *shouldn't* move this to src/bin, I think you may as well go put it there per Peter's suggestion. Then I think it's time to get this committed and move on to the next thing. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
more-doc-hacking.patch
Description: Binary data
