> On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 6:10 AM Justin Pryzby <mailto:pry...@telsasoft.com> 
> wrote:
> > Note also this CF entry
> > https://commitfest.postgresql.org/32/2987/
> > | Allow setting parallel_workers on partitioned tables
> 
> +/*
> + * PartitionedOptions
> + *     Contents of rd_options for partitioned tables
> + */
> +typedef struct PartitionedOptions
> +{
> +   int32       vl_len_;        /* varlena header (do not touch directly!) */
> +   bool        parallel_insert_enabled;    /* enables planner's use
> of parallel insert */
> +} PartitionedOptions;
> 
> houzj, could you please consider naming the struct PartitionedTableRdOptions
> as the patch for adding parallel_workers option to partitioned tables does?

Thanks for reminding.
I agreed that " PartitionedTableRdOptions " is better.

Attaching new version patch with this change.

Best regards,
houzj

Attachment: v27-0003-Parallel-SELECT-for-INSERT-INTO-.-SELECT-advanced-tests.patch
Description: v27-0003-Parallel-SELECT-for-INSERT-INTO-.-SELECT-advanced-tests.patch

Attachment: v27-0002-Add-new-GUC-option-enable_parallel_insert-boolean.patch
Description: v27-0002-Add-new-GUC-option-enable_parallel_insert-boolean.patch

Reply via email to