On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 11:31 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > John Naylor <john.nay...@enterprisedb.com> writes: > > While looking at the proposed removal of the v2 protocol, I noticed that we > > italicize some, but not all, instances of 'per se', 'pro forma', and 'ad > > hoc'. I'd say these are widespread enough in formal registers of English > > that they hardly need to be called out as foreign, so I propose removing > > the tags for those words. > > +1, nobody italicizes those in normal usage.
Now that protocol v2 is gone, here's a patch to remove those tags. > > The other case is 'voilà', found in rules.sgml. The case for italics here > > is stronger, but looking at that file, I actually think a more > > generic-sounding phrase here would be preferable. > > Yeah, seeing that we only use that in one place, I think we could do > without it. Looks like something as pedestrian as "The results are:" > would do fine. Done that way. -- John Naylor EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
v1-0001-Get-rid-of-foreignphrase-tags-in-the-docs.patch
Description: Binary data
