On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 02:02:02PM +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > > On 11 Feb 2021, at 14:10, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > > I don't think anyone has done anything wrong --- rather, it is what we > > are _trying_ to do that is complex. > > Global state changes in a cluster are complicated, and are unlikely to never > not be. By writing patches to attempts such state changes we can see which > pieces of infrastructure we're lacking to reduce complexity. A good example > is > the ProcSignalBarrier work that Andres and Robert did, inspired in part by > this > patch IIUC. The more we do, the more we learn.
Do we support or document the ability to create a standby with checksums from a primary without it, and is that a better approach? -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
