I wrote: > That seems like the proper fix, and I see you've started a thread for that. I don't think that change in behavior would be backpatchable, but patch here might have a chance at that.
I remembered after the fact that truncating line pointers would only allow for omitting the 2% slack logic (and has other benefits), but the rest of this patch would be needed regardless. -- John Naylor EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
