On 03/08/21 13:29, Chapman Flack wrote: > I think the s-free version is exactly the regexp_instr included in > the other concurrent proposal [1]
sorry. [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/fc160ee0-c843-b024-29bb-97b5da61971f%40darold.net
On 03/08/21 13:29, Chapman Flack wrote: > I think the s-free version is exactly the regexp_instr included in > the other concurrent proposal [1]
sorry. [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/fc160ee0-c843-b024-29bb-97b5da61971f%40darold.net