> On 7 Mar 2021, at 09:43, Tharakan, Robins <tha...@amazon.com> wrote:
> The patch (attached): > - Applies cleanly on REL9_6_STABLE - > c7a4fc3dd001646d5938687ad59ab84545d5d043 Did you target 9.6 because that's where you want to upgrade to, or is this not a problem on HEAD? If it's still a problem on HEAD you should probably submit the patch against there. You probably also want to add it to the next commit fest to make sure it's not forgotten about: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/33/ > I am not married to the patch (especially the argument name) but ideally I'd > prefer a way to get this upgrade going without a patch. For now, I am unable > to find any other way to upgrade a v9.5 Postgres database in this scenario, > facing End-of-Life. It's obviously not my call to make in any shape or form, but this doesn't really seem to fall under what is generally backported into a stable release? -- Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
