On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 13:36, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > + <para> > + Each backend running <command>VACUUM</command> without the > + <literal>FULL</literal> option will report its progress in the > + <structname>pg_stat_progress_vacuum</structname> view. Backends running > + <command>VACUUM</command> with the <literal>FULL</literal> option report > + progress in the <structname>pg_stat_progress_cluster</structname> view > + instead. See <xref linkend="vacuum-progress-reporting"/> and > + <xref linkend="cluster-progress-reporting"/> for details. > + </para> > > I think a typo, missing "will" between option and report - it's "with > the <literal>FULL</literal> option will report"
"Backends running [...] report progress to [...] instead" is, a.f.a.i.k., correct English. Adding 'will' would indeed still be correct, but it would in my opinion also be decremental to the readability of the section due to the repeated use of the same template sentence structure. I think that keeping it as-is is just fine. With regards, Matthias van de Meent.
