Amit Langote <amitlangot...@gmail.com> writes: > Also, I got reminded of this discussion from not so long ago:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/16302-e45634e2c0e34e97%40postgresql.org Yeah. Nobody seems to have pursued Peter's idea of changing the magic values to small negative ones, but that seems like a nicer idea than arguing over what large positive value is large enough. (Having said that, I remain pretty dubious that we're anywhere near getting any real-world use out of such a change.) regards, tom lane