Amit Langote <amitlangot...@gmail.com> writes:
> Also, I got reminded of this discussion from not so long ago:

> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/16302-e45634e2c0e34e97%40postgresql.org

Yeah.  Nobody seems to have pursued Peter's idea of changing the magic
values to small negative ones, but that seems like a nicer idea than
arguing over what large positive value is large enough.

(Having said that, I remain pretty dubious that we're anywhere near
getting any real-world use out of such a change.)

                        regards, tom lane


Reply via email to