Hi David, On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 10:21 PM David Steele <da...@pgmasters.net> wrote: > On 12/7/20 10:59 PM, Amit Langote wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 12:04 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi > > <horikyota....@gmail.com> wrote: > >> At Tue, 8 Dec 2020 01:16:00 +0900, Amit Langote <amitlangot...@gmail.com> > >> wrote in > >>> On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 23:48 Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> > >>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> I think this bit about splitting the struct is a distraction. Let's get > >>>> a patch that solves the bug first, and then we can discuss what further > >>>> refinements we want to do. I think we should get your patch in > >>>> CA+HiwqEOrfN9b=f3sdmyspgc4go-l_vmfhxllxvmmdp34e6...@mail.gmail.com > >>>> committed (which I have not read yet.) Do you agree with this plan? > >>> > >>> > >>> Yeah, I agree. > >> > >> Or > >> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/ca+hiwqgrr2yoo6vobm6m_oac9w-wmxe1gouq-uydpin6zjt...@mail.gmail.com > >> ? > >> > >> +1 from me to either one. > > > > Oh, I hadn't actually checked the actual message that Alvaro > > mentioned, but yeah I too am fine with either that one or the latest > > one. > > Any progress on the decision of how to handle this bug? Not sure if that > was handled elsewhere but it appears to be key to making progress on > this patch.
The v3 patch posted on Dec 4 is still what is being proposed to fix this. I don't know of any unaddressed comments on the patch, so I've marked the entry Ready for Committer. -- Amit Langote EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
