> On Mar 1, 2021, at 12:05 PM, Pavel Borisov <pashkin.e...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The regression test you provided is not portable. I am getting lots of > errors due to differing output of the form "page lsn=0/4DAD7E0". You might > turn this into a TAP test and use a regular expression to check the output. > May I ask you to ensure you used v3 of a patch to check? I've made tests > portable in v3, probably, you've checked not the last version. Yes, my review was of v2. Updating to v3, I see that the test passes on my laptop. It still looks brittle to have all the tid values in the test output, but it does pass. > Thanks for your attention to the patch Thanks for the patch! — Mark Dilger EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
- [PATCH] Improve amcheck to also check UNIQUE constraint in... Pavel Borisov
- Re: [PATCH] Improve amcheck to also check UNIQUE cons... Pavel Borisov
- Re: [PATCH] Improve amcheck to also check UNIQUE cons... Mark Dilger
- Re: [PATCH] Improve amcheck to also check UNIQUE ... Pavel Borisov
- Re: [PATCH] Improve amcheck to also check UNI... Pavel Borisov
- Re: [PATCH] Improve amcheck to also check UNI... Zhihong Yu
- Re: [PATCH] Improve amcheck to also check UNI... Mark Dilger
- Re: [PATCH] Improve amcheck to also check... Pavel Borisov
- Re: [PATCH] Improve amcheck to also ... Mark Dilger
- Re: [PATCH] Improve amcheck to a... Tom Lane
- Re: [PATCH] Improve amcheck to also check... Pavel Borisov
- Re: [PATCH] Improve amcheck to also ... Mark Dilger
- Re: [PATCH] Improve amcheck to a... Pavel Borisov
- Re: [PATCH] Improve amcheck ... Mark Dilger
- Re: [PATCH] Improve amcheck to also check... Peter Geoghegan
- Re: [PATCH] Improve amcheck to also check UNIQUE cons... Peter Geoghegan
- Re: [PATCH] Improve amcheck to also check UNIQUE ... Pavel Borisov