On 2021-Feb-21, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 12:25:58PM -0300, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Hmm. Alternatively, maybe it'd make sense to change
> > HeapTupleHeaderSetMovedPartition to use ItemPointerSetMovedPartitions
> > instead of doing ItemPointerSet directly. But that looks mostly
> > pointless, since the extensibility aspect of this interface has been
> > superseded by table AM work. I agree we should just remove the macro
> > and update the comment as you suggest.
>
> Thanks. So you will do this change in the same commit, right?
I changed my mind on this after noticing that
ItemPointerIndicatesMovedPartitions has a few callers; leaving the
interface incomplete/asymmetric would be worse. So I propose to do
this.
diff --git a/src/include/access/htup_details.h
b/src/include/access/htup_details.h
index 7c62852e7f..86b3622b5e 100644
--- a/src/include/access/htup_details.h
+++ b/src/include/access/htup_details.h
@@ -443,11 +443,10 @@ do { \
)
#define HeapTupleHeaderIndicatesMovedPartitions(tup) \
- (ItemPointerGetOffsetNumber(&(tup)->t_ctid) ==
MovedPartitionsOffsetNumber && \
- ItemPointerGetBlockNumberNoCheck(&(tup)->t_ctid) ==
MovedPartitionsBlockNumber)
+ ItemPointerIndicatesMovedPartitions(&(tup)->t_ctid)
#define HeapTupleHeaderSetMovedPartitions(tup) \
- ItemPointerSet(&(tup)->t_ctid, MovedPartitionsBlockNumber,
MovedPartitionsOffsetNumber)
+ ItemPointerSetMovedPartitions(&(tup)->t_ctid)
#define HeapTupleHeaderGetDatumLength(tup) \
VARSIZE(tup)
--
Álvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile
"¿Cómo puedes confiar en algo que pagas y que no ves,
y no confiar en algo que te dan y te lo muestran?" (Germán Poo)
