Hello,

Andrew Gierth pointed out that I left behind some outdated advice
about RAID spindles in the GUC's extra description field, in commit
b09ff536.  Let's just drop that description.  Patch attached.
From bb2fad4c540b18ad1683f7d69783f9b2634b1da2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 21:11:37 +1300
Subject: [PATCH] Remove outdated reference to RAID spindles.

Commit b09ff536 left behind some outdated advice in the "extra_desc"
field of the GUC "effective_io_concurrency".  Remove it.

Back-patch to 13.

Reported-by: Andrew Gierth <and...@tao11.riddles.org.uk>
---
 src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c b/src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c
index 00018abb7d..260ec7b97e 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c
@@ -2951,7 +2951,7 @@ static struct config_int ConfigureNamesInt[] =
 			PGC_USERSET,
 			RESOURCES_ASYNCHRONOUS,
 			gettext_noop("Number of simultaneous requests that can be handled efficiently by the disk subsystem."),
-			gettext_noop("For RAID arrays, this should be approximately the number of drive spindles in the array."),
+			NULL,
 			GUC_EXPLAIN
 		},
 		&effective_io_concurrency,
-- 
2.30.0

Reply via email to