Hi,
+               (errmsg("BaseSnapshot cant't be setup at point %X/%X",
+                       (uint32) (lsn >> 32), (uint32) lsn),
+                errdetail("Top transaction is running.")));

Did you mean this errdetail:

Top transaction is not running.

Cheers

On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 12:34 PM Ranier Vilela <ranier...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Em sáb., 13 de fev. de 2021 às 01:07, Zhihong Yu <z...@yugabyte.com>
> escreveu:
>
>> Hi,
>> How about the following patch ?
>>
>> ReorderBufferSetBaseSnapshot() can return a bool to indicate whether the
>> base snapshot is set up.
>>
>> For the call by SnapBuildCommitTxn(), it seems xid is top transaction. So
>> the return value doesn't need to be checked.
>>
> IMO anything else is better than PANIC.
> Anyway, if all fails, reporting an error can contribute to checking where.
>
> Attached a patch suggestion v2.
> 1. SnapBuildProcessChange returns a result of
> ReorderBufferSetBaseSnapshot, so the caller can act accordingly.
> 2. SnapBuildCommitTxn can't ignore a result
> from ReorderBufferSetBaseSnapshot, even if it never fails.
>
> regards,
> Ranier Vilela
>

Reply via email to