Em qui., 11 de fev. de 2021 às 09:47, Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> escreveu:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 09:14:46AM -0300, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> > It is necessary to correct the interfaces. To caller, inform the size of
> > the buffer it created.
>
> Now, the patch you sent has no need to be that complicated, and it
> partially works while not actually solving at all the problem you are
> trying to solve (nothing done for MD5 or OpenSSL). Attached is an
> example of what I finish with while poking at this issue. There is IMO
> no point to touch the internals of SCRAM that all rely on the same
> digest lengths for the proof generation with SHA256.
>
Ok, I take a look at your patch and I have comments:
1. Looks missed contrib/pgcrypto.
2. scram_HMAC_final function still have a exchanged parameters,
which in the future may impair maintenance.
Attached the v3 same patch.
regards,
Ranier Vilela
pg_cryptohash_v3.patch
Description: Binary data
