I wrote:
> After digging in gcc's release history, it seems they invented
> "-fsanitize=alignment" in GCC 5, so we can make this work for gcc
> by writing
> #if __GNUC__ >= 5
> (the likely() macro already uses a similar approach). Can't say
> if that's close enough for clang too.
Ugh, no it isn't: even pretty recent clang releases only define
__GNUC__ as 4. It looks like we need a separate test on clang's
version. I looked at their version history and sanitizers seem
to have come in around clang 7, so I propose the attached (where
I worked a bit harder on the comment, too).
regards, tom lane
diff --git a/src/include/c.h b/src/include/c.h
index ae978830da..a86342093e 100644
--- a/src/include/c.h
+++ b/src/include/c.h
@@ -132,6 +132,18 @@
#define pg_nodiscard
#endif
+/*
+ * Place this macro before functions that should be allowed to make misaligned
+ * accesses. Think twice before using it on non-x86-specific code!
+ * Testing can be done with "-fsanitize=alignment -fsanitize-trap=alignment"
+ * on clang, or "-fsanitize=alignment -fno-sanitize-recover=alignment" on gcc.
+ */
+#if __clang_major__ >= 7 || __GNUC__ >= 5
+#define pg_attribute_no_sanitize_alignment() __attribute__((no_sanitize("alignment")))
+#else
+#define pg_attribute_no_sanitize_alignment()
+#endif
+
/*
* Append PG_USED_FOR_ASSERTS_ONLY to definitions of variables that are only
* used in assert-enabled builds, to avoid compiler warnings about unused
diff --git a/src/port/pg_crc32c_sse42.c b/src/port/pg_crc32c_sse42.c
index 3b94a7388a..10fc01e1f0 100644
--- a/src/port/pg_crc32c_sse42.c
+++ b/src/port/pg_crc32c_sse42.c
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
#include "port/pg_crc32c.h"
+pg_attribute_no_sanitize_alignment()
pg_crc32c
pg_comp_crc32c_sse42(pg_crc32c crc, const void *data, size_t len)
{
