On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 11:10 AM Mark Dilger
<mark.dil...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Numbered 0001 in this next patch set.

Hi,

I committed 0001 as you had it and 0002 with some more cleanups. Things I did:

- Adjusted some comments.
- Changed processQueryResult so that it didn't do foo(bar) with foo
being a pointer. Generally we prefer (*foo)(bar) when it can be
confused with a direct function call, but wunk->foo(bar) is also
considered acceptable.
- Changed the return type of ParallelSlotResultHandler to be bool,
because having it return PGresult * seemed to offer no advantages.

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com


Reply via email to