On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 11:53 AM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 12:58:29PM +0530, Dilip Kumar wrote:
> > Looks good to me.
>
> Rather than using the term "recovery state", I would just use
> SharedRecoveryState.  This leads me to the attached.

Alright, that too looks good.  Thank you !

Regards,
Amul


Reply via email to