On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 4:39 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 6:55 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > So it's not a no-op, but on the other hand it's not succeeding in getting
> > bits down to the platter. I'm not inclined to dike it out, but it does
> > seem problematic that we're defaulting to open_datasync, which is also
> > not getting bits down to the platter.
>
> Hmm, OK, from these times it does appear that O_SYNC and O_DSYNC
> actually do something then. It's baffling that they are undocumented.
I was digging through Apple sources again trying to learn something
about bug report #16827, and I spotted one extra detail that I wanted
to share in this thread about these undocumented system interfaces,
just for the record. It appears that as of macOS 11.2/XNU 7195.83.3,
their vn_write() doesn't treat O_DSYNC any differently than O_SYNC:
/*
* Treat synchronous mounts and O_FSYNC on the fd as equivalent.
*
* XXX We treat O_DSYNC as O_FSYNC for now, since we can not delay
* XXX the non-essential metadata without some additional VFS work;
* XXX the intent at this point is to plumb the interface for it.
*/
if ((fp->fp_glob->fg_flag & (O_FSYNC | O_DSYNC)) ||
(vp->v_mount && (vp->v_mount->mnt_flag & MNT_SYNCHRONOUS))) {
ioflag |= IO_SYNC;
}
