On 2021-Feb-04, Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> writes: > > On 2021-Feb-04, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > >> Ok, here we go. > > > Are you going to bump the .so version for this? I think that should be > > done, since some functions disappear and there are struct changes. It > > is curious, though, to see that exports.txt needs no changes. > > Uh, what? There should be no externally visible ABI changes in libpq > (he says without having read the patch). If there's a need for a library > major version bump, that'd be sufficient reason not to do this IMO.
Yeah, the changes I was thinking about are all in libpq-int.h so that's not really a problem. But one enum in libpq-fe.h renumbers values, and I think it's better to keep the old value labelled as "unused" to avoid any changes. -- Álvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile
