On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 10:23:30PM -0600, Kenneth Marshall wrote: > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 01:06:29PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 10:42:25PM -0500, Sehrope Sarkuni wrote: > > > +1 to adding a SHA1 SQL function. Even if it's deprecated, there's plenty > > > of historical usage that I can see it being useful. > > > > Let's wait for more opinions to see if we agree that this addition is > > helpful or not. Even if this is not added, I think that there is > > still value in refactoring the code anyway for the SHA-2 functions. > > > > +1 I know that it has been deprecated, but it can be very useful when > working with data from pre-deprecation. :) It is annoying to have to > resort to plperl or plpython because it is not available. The lack or > orthogonality is painful.
Yes, I think having SHA1 makes sense --- there are probably still valid uses for it. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
