Hi Masahiko: On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 9:15 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Andy, > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 9:15 PM Andy Fan <zhihui.fan1...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 4:16 PM Jesper Pedersen < > jesper.peder...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> On 12/5/20 10:38 PM, Andy Fan wrote: > >> > Currently the UniqueKey is defined as a List of Expr, rather than > >> > EquivalenceClasses. > >> > A complete discussion until now can be found at [1] (The messages I > replied > >> > to also > >> > care a lot and the information is completed). This patch has stopped > at > >> > this place for > >> > a while, I'm planning to try EquivalenceClasses, but any suggestion > would > >> > be welcome. > >> > > >> > > >> > >> Unfortunately I think we need a RfC style patch of both versions in > >> their minimum implementation. > >> > >> Hopefully this will make it easier for one or more committers to decide > >> on the right direction since they can do a side-by-side comparison of > >> the two solutions. > >> > > > > I do get the exact same idea. Actually I have made EquivalenceClasses > > works with baserel last weekend and then I realized it is hard to compare > > the 2 situations without looking into the real/Poc code, even for very > > experienced people. I will submit a new patch after I get the > partitioned > > relation, subquery works. Hope I can make it in one week. > > Status update for a commitfest entry. > > Are you planning to submit a new patch? Or is there any blocker for > this work? This patch entry on CF app has been in state Waiting on > Author for a while. If there is any update on that, please reflect on > CF app. > > > I agree that the current status is "Waiting on author", and no block issue for others. I plan to work on this in 1 month. I have to get my current urgent case completed first. Sorry for the delay action and thanks for asking. -- Best Regards Andy Fan (https://www.aliyun.com/)
