I read the patch and have two points:

1. I do basebackup for database then switch wal level from logical to none to 
logical and
of cause I archive the wal segments. Next I do PITR base on the basebackup, as 
a result
it success startup with a waring said maybe data missed.

Because the 'none' level is to bulkload data, do you think it's good that we 
still support
recover from a 'none' wal level.

2. I just mark wal_level as 'none' but fail to startup, it success after I drop 
the publication and
it's subscription,mark max_wal_senders as 0, drop replicate slot. I think it 
worth to write how 
we can startup a 'none' wal level database in document .

Reply via email to