On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 10:13:52PM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote: > On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 03:28:08PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > I think these patches could use some in-place documentation of what they are > > trying to achieve and how they do it. The required information is spread > > over a lengthy thread. No one wants to read that. Add commit messages to > > the patches. > > 0001 patch fixes pg_upgrade/test.sh, which was disfunctional. > Portions of the first patch were independently handled by commits 52202bb39, > fa744697c, 091866724. So this is rebased on those. > I guess updating this script should be a part of a beta-checklist somewhere, > since I guess nobody will want to backpatch changes for testing older > releases.
Uh, what exactly is missing from the beta checklist? I read the patch and commit message but don't understand it. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
