> 12 янв. 2021 г., в 13:49, Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> написал(а):
>
> What do you think of abandoning slru-truncate-t-insurance entirely? As of
> https://postgr.es/m/20200330052809.gb2324...@rfd.leadboat.com I liked the idea
> behind it, despite its complicating the system for hackers and DBAs. The
> TruncateMultiXact() interaction rendered it less appealing. In v14+, commit
> cd5e822 mitigates the kind of bugs that slru-truncate-t-insurance mitigates,
> further reducing the latter's value. slru-truncate-t-insurance does mitigate
> larger trespasses into unlink-eligible space, though.
I seem to me that not committing an insurance patch is not a mistake. Let's
abandon slru-truncate-t-insurance for now.
>> Fix <slru-truncate-modulo-v6.patch> certainly worth backpatching.
>
> I'll push it on Saturday, probably.
Thanks!
Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
