On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 8:03 PM 赵锐 <875941...@qq.com> wrote:
>
> The first file of Amit's patch can not only re-range the code, but also fix a 
> hidden bug.
> To make it easy to see, I attach another patch.
> "RelationIdGetRelation" will increase ref on owner->relrefarr, without 
> "RelationClose", the owner->relrefarr will enlarge and re-hash.
> When the capacity of owner->relrefarr is over than 10 million, enlarge and 
> re-hash takes serial hours. And what's worse, increase ref will also take 
> minutes, as the hash collision resolution is based on looking up an array in 
> order.
> When we want to publish 10 billion data under one partition table, it takes 
> serial days up to increase ref, enlarge and re-hash, and CPU is always 99%.
> After applying my patch, 10 billion will be published in 10 minutes.
>

It is a clear relation descriptor leak. The proposed fix seems correct
to me. The patch wasn't getting applied to HEAD. So, I have prepared
the separate patches for HEAD and 13. There are minor modifications in
the patch like I have used RelationIsValid before closing the
relation. I have not added any test because I see that there is
already a test in src/test/subscription/t/013_partition.

Kindly let me know your English name so that I can give you credit as
a co-author?

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

Attachment: v1-0001-Fix-relation-descriptor-leak.HEAD.patch
Description: Binary data

Attachment: v1-0001-Fix-relation-descriptor-leak.13.patch
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to