Tomas Vondra <tomas.von...@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> I don't see aby benchmark results in this thread, allowing me to make
> that conclusion, and I find it hard to believe that 200MB/client is a
> sensible trade-off.
> It assumes you have that much memory, and it may allow easy DoS attack
> (although maybe it's not worse than e.g. generating a lot of I/O or
> running expensive function). Maybe allowing limiting the compression
> level / decompression buffer size in postgresql.conf would be enough. Or
> maybe allow disabling such compression algorithms altogether.
The link Ken pointed at suggests that restricting the window size to
8MB is a common compromise. It's not clear to me what that does to
the achievable compression ratio. Even 8MB could be an annoying cost
if it's being paid per-process, on both the server and client sides.
regards, tom lane
