On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 03:00:32PM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote: > I agree with Stephen; so maybe that part of the Wiki needs to be updated > instead of having it sit there for use as a hammer when someone disagrees with > a proffered patch. > > Or maybe consider that "a patch" doesn't only mean "implement" - it is simply > another language through which desirability and design can also be > communicated. The author gets to decide how wordy their prose is and choosing > a wordy but concise language that is understandable by the vast majority of > the > target audience seems like it should be considered acceptable.
If you want to debate that TODO section, you will need to start a new thread. I suggest Alastair's patch also appear in a new thread. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
