On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 4:08 AM Anastasia Lubennikova <a.lubennik...@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > > On 01.12.2020 03:08, James Coleman wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 4:39 PM Tomas Vondra > > <tomas.von...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > >> I've pushed the 0001 part, i.e. the main fix. Not sure about the other > >> parts (comments and moving the code back to postgres_fdw) yet. > > I noticed the CF entry [1] got moved to the next CF; I'm thinking this > > entry should be marked as committed since the fix for the initial bug > > reported on this thread has been pushed. We have the parallel safety > > issue outstanding, but there's a separate thread and patch for that, > > so I'll make a new CF entry for that. > > > > I can mark it as committed, but I'm not sure how to "undo" (or if > > that's desirable) the move to the next CF. > > > > Thoughts? > > > > James > > > > 1: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/30/2754/ > > > > > Oops... > I must have rushed with this one, thank you for noticing. > I don't see how to move it back either. I think it's fine to mark it as > Committed where it is now. >
BTW, I still see this one as needs review -- Jaime Casanova Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte 24x7 y capacitaciĆ³n